|
ONTD and Amber Heard Groupthink is back in full force over there. Trial recap posts by user thirteenarrows invariably include “I’m just so exhausted, my work never ends” and “Believe survivors” (but not if they’re male). Comments are an enormous echo chamber and now anyone not marching in lockstep is reported and kicked out of the community. Really weird shit. by Anonymous reply 31 June 1, 2022 11:39 AM
The anti Amber campaign is funded. On Twitter a cyber company outed that it is a combination of bot driven accounts with managed accounts by human trolls. A lot have promoted linked to their tweets. This means the account has paid twitter to be promoted. There are also paid articles promoted in mainstream media. The Daily Heil allegedly is a good example. One of Depps team Adam has alleged direct links to Russian troll farms. Google it. He is quite notorious. by Anonymous reply 1 May 30, 2022 10:32 PM
Give me a freaking break, whoever is running this PR campaign isn’t the brightest crayon in the box. I go on YouTube and suddenly get 100 videos about how great Depp is even though I’ve never watched a video about him. You go on Reddit and unrelated threads have Johnny suppress on it. Twitter? Hundreds of thousands of Depp fans popping up out of a sudden. Really? If he has so many “fans” then why have his movies been tanking on the past 10 years? This shit has Adam Waldman written all over it. They just don’t know how to be subtle trolls. by Anonymous reply 2 May 30, 2022 10:44 PM
Amber will be just fine. She has an ElonMuskBaby and will be paid accordingly (I imagine at least $100,000/month, if not more). Ugly toad Depp, who spent his money on sending a drunk's ashes into space will not have it so easy. No more millions to waste. Strict budget. Awful life to look forward to. by Anonymous reply 3 May 30, 2022 10:47 PM
Oh my god. Fuck off, aspie! We all know your crazy ass is OCD over that grifting whore. There is no way this many people feel this way about scAmber. by Anonymous reply 4 May 30, 2022 10:48 PM
Honestly this is just more evidence that both sides are fucking nuts to me. by Anonymous reply 5 May 30, 2022 10:50 PM
R5 right? These Amber assholes are just as insufferable if not worse. Everybody knows Depp is a drunk, but she is cray as fuck. by Anonymous reply 6 May 30, 2022 10:52 PM
I don't like either one but the Depp fangurls creep me the fuck out. by Anonymous reply 7 May 30, 2022 10:54 PM
People like OP don't give a shit about any victims. Male or female. I don't see the Johnny Depp famgirls and fanboys rallying around the Kevin Spacey victims by Anonymous reply 8 May 30, 2022 10:56 PM
They’re both nasty! by Anonymous reply 9 May 30, 2022 10:56 PM
R8, I am OP and R5. I don't know how objecting to cult-like groupthink and outright censorship of wrongthink as "abuse" = my not caring about victims. Both sides are guilty of this, but what's going on ONTD is bothering me because if I expressed any skepticism about Heard's account--skepticism that is rational given what we know--I would get banned. That's insane. Btw, I think Depp was abusive, so I don't think he should win the case. I also think Heard may have been abusive, and not always in self-defense. I'm no Depp looney. by Anonymous reply 10 May 30, 2022 11:48 PM
R10 why do you care if unstable scAmber loons think you are a Depp Stan? They are fucking daft themselves. She was in a toxic marriage mostly of her own making. She went out and falsely accused this guy of disgusting acts of sexual assault. At this point I can’t believe anything that vindictive cunt has to say. The dude is a drunk slob and a pretentious kook. So what? Gives her zero right to fabricate physical and sexual violence claims. Her supporters are idiots. by Anonymous reply 11 May 31, 2022 1:00 AM
ONTD has the developed a particular taste for stanning female narcissists beyond all sense: Amber Heard, Meghan Markle, Angelina Jolie; all are saints, and their enemies are the purest of evil. It's tiresome. by Anonymous reply 12 May 31, 2022 1:05 AM
Oh God forbid there be a pro Amber site, OP 🙄 by Anonymous reply 13 May 31, 2022 5:41 AM
Beautiful women can get away with murder by Anonymous reply 14 May 31, 2022 5:51 AM
R2 Exactly. I don’t look up anything JD on YouTube yet all these anti-AH videos are constantly on my homepage. I’m not a fan of hers either, but it’s obvious this is orchestrated. by Anonymous reply 15 May 31, 2022 5:57 AM
R13, it’s the explicit censorship stemming from doctrinaire thinking on the topic that I’m objecting to. I think the anti-AH stuff is both orchestrated and organic and very destructive. by Anonymous reply 16 May 31, 2022 6:12 AM
Aren't you a little old to be on ONTD op? Is it 2008? by Anonymous reply 17 May 31, 2022 6:18 AM
[quote]Both sides are guilty of this, but what's going on ONTD is bothering me because if I expressed any skepticism about Heard's account--skepticism that is rational given what we know--I would get banned. That's insane. I went out to ONTD and I'm seeing people who say they don't believe Amber will win, and they're not banned. Do you have any evidence that people are getting banned for non-bannable comments? Banned just for their opinion? And don't waste my time with any "everyone knows that ONTD is awful" blah blah blah. Show me actual evidence. I doubt you have any, but if you do, show it. by Anonymous reply 18 May 31, 2022 8:54 AM
I don't believe Heard for a second but Johnny is no angel either. by Anonymous reply 19 May 31, 2022 10:55 AM
R18, have you actually gone to the posts? People are proudly announcing that they are mass reporting (as well as downvoting) skeptical comments. What more evidence do you want? by Anonymous reply 20 May 31, 2022 5:20 PM
I appreciate their posts about the trial but I can’t stand ONTD. It’s pure misery over there. They view themselves as having a moral high ground compared to the rest of the internet which is a joke. by Anonymous reply 21 May 31, 2022 10:24 PM
R20 I did, and every post I saw that talked about reporting people said they were reporting abusive stuff. Never once saw a comment about people reporting tweets that they simply disagreed with. It's fucking adorable that you didn't include any evidence and then bitched because I didn't believe all the evidence you submitted. by Anonymous reply 22 June 1, 2022 10:48 AM
R22, as I stated in the OP, abuse = not agreeing with them. You’re being disingenuous. by Anonymous reply 23 June 1, 2022 10:52 AM
R23, fyi, R18 / R22 is one of these obnoxious Meghan Markle fanfish infesting this place, calling the gays in here 'fags', etc. by Anonymous reply 24 June 1, 2022 10:54 AM
Ah, thanks r24. No wonder she’s so triggered by ONTD being called out. by Anonymous reply 25 June 1, 2022 11:00 AM
I have done no such fucking thing, R24. And R25, you need to be more careful about believing the shit trolls post. Post one example of me being a Meghan fangirl or being a homophobe. I'll wait. by Anonymous reply 26 June 1, 2022 11:18 AM
R26 hates gay people. by Anonymous reply 27 June 1, 2022 11:28 AM
I'm gay. The troll at r24 referring to DLers as "the gays in this place" is not. Gosh, though, whatta surprise that the thread went completely silent except for one little sockpuppet, never saw that coming. by Anonymous reply 28 June 1, 2022 11:31 AM
R26, I only block Meghan Markle fanfish and I've blocked you. I did so for a particular reason, you know . . . by Anonymous reply 29 June 1, 2022 11:36 AM
Time to get another sock puppet account, cunt @ R28. by Anonymous reply 30 June 1, 2022 11:36 AM
Look at the Meghan Markle fan heifer WWing her own posts with her other accounts, LOLOLOLOL. Seriously, what a pathetic life these morons have: Madame Duchess wouldn't piss on them if they were on fire. by Anonymous reply 31 June 1, 2022 11:39 AM(责任编辑:) |
